Mathematical Language Processing: Automatic Grading and Feedback for Open Response Mathematical Questions
January 18, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Andrew S. Lan, Divyanshu Vats, Andrew E. Waters, Richard G. Baraniuk
arXiv ID
1501.04346
Category
stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat)
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.CL,
cs.LG
Citations
89
Venue
ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
While computer and communication technologies have provided effective means to scale up many aspects of education, the submission and grading of assessments such as homework assignments and tests remains a weak link. In this paper, we study the problem of automatically grading the kinds of open response mathematical questions that figure prominently in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) courses. Our data-driven framework for mathematical language processing (MLP) leverages solution data from a large number of learners to evaluate the correctness of their solutions, assign partial-credit scores, and provide feedback to each learner on the likely locations of any errors. MLP takes inspiration from the success of natural language processing for text data and comprises three main steps. First, we convert each solution to an open response mathematical question into a series of numerical features. Second, we cluster the features from several solutions to uncover the structures of correct, partially correct, and incorrect solutions. We develop two different clustering approaches, one that leverages generic clustering algorithms and one based on Bayesian nonparametrics. Third, we automatically grade the remaining (potentially large number of) solutions based on their assigned cluster and one instructor-provided grade per cluster. As a bonus, we can track the cluster assignment of each step of a multistep solution and determine when it departs from a cluster of correct solutions, which enables us to indicate the likely locations of errors to learners. We test and validate MLP on real-world MOOC data to demonstrate how it can substantially reduce the human effort required in large-scale educational platforms.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Machine Learning (Stat)
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Layer Normalization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted