Construction and impromptu repair of an MST in a distributed network with o(m) communication
February 11, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Valerie King, Shay Kutten, Mikkel Thorup
arXiv ID
1502.03320
Category
cs.DC: Distributed Computing
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
62
Venue
ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
In the CONGEST model, a communications network is an undirected graph whose $n$ nodes are processors and whose $m$ edges are the communications links between processors. At any given time step, a message of size $O(\log n)$ may be sent by each node to each of its neighbors. We show for the synchronous model: If all nodes start in the same round, and each node knows its ID and the ID's of its neighbors, or in the case of MST, the distinct weights of its incident edges and knows $n$, then there are Monte Carlo algorithms which succeed w.h.p. to determine a minimum spanning forest (MST) and a spanning forest (ST) using $O(n \log^2 n/\log\log n)$ messages for MST and $O(n \log n )$ messages for ST, resp. These results contradict the "folk theorem" noted in Awerbuch, et.al., JACM 1990 that the distributed construction of a broadcast tree requires $Ξ©(m)$ messages. This lower bound has been shown there and in other papers for some CONGEST models; our protocol demonstrates the limits of these models. A dynamic distributed network is one which undergoes online edge insertions or deletions. We also show how to repair an MST or ST in a dynamic network with asynchronous communication. An edge deletion can be processed in $O(n\log n /\log \log n)$ expected messages in the MST, and $O(n)$ expected messages for the ST problem, while an edge insertion uses $O(n)$ messages in the worst case. We call this "impromptu" updating as we assume that between processing of edge updates there is no preprocessing or storage of additional information. Previous algorithms for this problem that use an amortized $o(m)$ messages per update require substantial preprocessing and additional local storage between updates.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Distributed Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reproducing GW150914: the first observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
iFogSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Resource Management Techniques in Internet of Things, Edge and Fog Computing Environments
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted