Counting hypergraph matchings up to uniqueness threshold

March 19, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Renjie Song, Yitong Yin, Jinman Zhao arXiv ID 1503.05812 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed math.CO Citations 10 Venue International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of approximately counting matchings in hypergraphs of bounded maximum degree and maximum size of hyperedges. With an activity parameter $Ξ»$, each matching $M$ is assigned a weight $Ξ»^{|M|}$. The counting problem is formulated as computing a partition function that gives the sum of the weights of all matchings in a hypergraph. This problem unifies two extensively studied statistical physics models in approximate counting: the hardcore model (graph independent sets) and the monomer-dimer model (graph matchings). For this model, the critical activity $Ξ»_c= \frac{d^d}{k (d-1)^{d+1}}$ is the threshold for the uniqueness of Gibbs measures on the infinite $(d+1)$-uniform $(k+1)$-regular hypertree. Consider hypergraphs of maximum degree at most $k+1$ and maximum size of hyperedges at most $d+1$. We show that when $Ξ»< Ξ»_c$, there is an FPTAS for computing the partition function; and when $Ξ»= Ξ»_c$, there is a PTAS for computing the log-partition function. These algorithms are based on the decay of correlation (strong spatial mixing) property of Gibbs distributions. When $Ξ»> 2Ξ»_c$, there is no PRAS for the partition function or the log-partition function unless NP$=$RP. Towards obtaining a sharp transition of computational complexity of approximate counting, we study the local convergence from a sequence of finite hypergraphs to the infinite lattice with specified symmetry. We show a surprising connection between the local convergence and the reversibility of a natural random walk. This leads us to a barrier for the hardness result: The non-uniqueness of infinite Gibbs measure is not realizable by any finite gadgets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted