Gradual Release of Sensitive Data under Differential Privacy
April 02, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Fragkiskos Koufogiannis, Shuo Han, George J. Pappas
arXiv ID
1504.00429
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
41
Venue
Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
We introduce the problem of releasing sensitive data under differential privacy when the privacy level is subject to change over time. Existing work assumes that privacy level is determined by the system designer as a fixed value before sensitive data is released. For certain applications, however, users may wish to relax the privacy level for subsequent releases of the same data after either a re-evaluation of the privacy concerns or the need for better accuracy. Specifically, given a database containing sensitive data, we assume that a response $y_1$ that preserves $Ξ΅_{1}$-differential privacy has already been published. Then, the privacy level is relaxed to $Ξ΅_2$, with $Ξ΅_2 > Ξ΅_1$, and we wish to publish a more accurate response $y_2$ while the joint response $(y_1, y_2)$ preserves $Ξ΅_2$-differential privacy. How much accuracy is lost in the scenario of gradually releasing two responses $y_1$ and $y_2$ compared to the scenario of releasing a single response that is $Ξ΅_{2}$-differentially private? Our results show that there exists a composite mechanism that achieves \textit{no loss} in accuracy. We consider the case in which the private data lies within $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ with an adjacency relation induced by the $\ell_{1}$-norm, and we focus on mechanisms that approximate identity queries. We show that the same accuracy can be achieved in the case of gradual release through a mechanism whose outputs can be described by a \textit{lazy Markov stochastic process}. This stochastic process has a closed form expression and can be efficiently sampled. Our results are applicable beyond identity queries. To this end, we demonstrate that our results can be applied in several cases, including Google's RAPPOR project, trading of sensitive data, and controlled transmission of private data in a social network.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted