A Sparse Gaussian Process Framework for Photometric Redshift Estimation
May 20, 2015 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ibrahim A. Almosallam, Sam N. Lindsay, Matt J. Jarvis, Stephen J. Roberts
arXiv ID
1505.05489
Category
astro-ph.IM
Cross-listed
astro-ph.GA,
cs.CV
Citations
48
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Accurate photometric redshifts are a lynchpin for many future experiments to pin down the cosmological model and for studies of galaxy evolution. In this study, a novel sparse regression framework for photometric redshift estimation is presented. Simulated and real data from SDSS DR12 were used to train and test the proposed models. We show that approaches which include careful data preparation and model design offer a significant improvement in comparison with several competing machine learning algorithms. Standard implementations of most regression algorithms have as the objective the minimization of the sum of squared errors. For redshift inference, however, this induces a bias in the posterior mean of the output distribution, which can be problematic. In this paper we directly target minimizing $ฮz = (z_\textrm{s} - z_\textrm{p})/(1+z_\textrm{s})$ and address the bias problem via a distribution-based weighting scheme, incorporated as part of the optimization objective. The results are compared with other machine learning algorithms in the field such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Gaussian Processes (GPs) and sparse GPs. The proposed framework reaches a mean absolute $ฮz = 0.0026(1+z_\textrm{s})$, over the redshift range of $0 \le z_\textrm{s} \le 2$ on the simulated data, and $ฮz = 0.0178(1+z_\textrm{s})$ over the entire redshift range on the SDSS DR12 survey, outperforming the standard ANNz used in the literature. We also investigate how the relative size of the training set affects the photometric redshift accuracy. We find that a training set of \textgreater 30 per cent of total sample size, provides little additional constraint on the photometric redshifts, and note that our GP formalism strongly outperforms ANNz in the sparse data regime for the simulated data set.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ astro-ph.IM
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Neural Networks to Enable Real-time Multimessenger Astrophysics
๐
๐
Old Age
Star-galaxy Classification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
CosmoGAN: creating high-fidelity weak lensing convergence maps using Generative Adversarial Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Non-negative Matrix Factorization: Robust Extraction of Extended Structures
R.I.P.
๐
404 Not Found
Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Supernovae Classification
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted