๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Safety Verification and Refutation by k-invariants and k-induction (extended version)
June 18, 2015 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ Sensors Applications Symposium
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Martin Brain, Saurabh Joshi, Daniel Kroening, Peter Schrammel
arXiv ID
1506.05671
Category
cs.LO: Logic in CS
Cross-listed
cs.SE
Citations
59
Venue
Sensors Applications Symposium
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Most software verification tools can be classified into one of a number of established families, each of which has their own focus and strengths. For example, concrete counterexample generation in model checking, invariant inference in abstract interpretation and completeness via annotation for deductive verification. This creates a significant and fundamental usability problem as users may have to learn and use one technique to find potential problems but then need an entirely different one to show that they have been fixed. This paper presents a single, unified algorithm kIkI, which strictly generalises abstract interpretation, bounded model checking and k-induction. This not only combines the strengths of these techniques but allows them to interact and reinforce each other, giving a `single-tool' approach to verification.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Logic in CS
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Omega-Regular Objectives in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal