A multipath energy-conserving routing protocol for wireless ad hoc networks lifetime improvement
June 18, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Omar Smail, Bernard Cousin, Zoulikha Mekkakia, Rachida Mekki
arXiv ID
1506.05693
Category
cs.NI: Networking & Internet
Citations
48
Venue
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
Ad hoc networks are wireless mobile networks that can operate without infrastructure and without centralized network management. Traditional techniques of routing are not well adapted. Indeed, their lack of reactivity with respect to the variability of network changes makes them difficult to use. Moreover, conserving energy is a critical concern in the design of routing protocols for ad hoc networks, because most mobile nodes operate with limited battery capacity, and the energy depletion of a node affects not only the node itself but also the overall network lifetime. In all proposed single-path routing schemes a new path-discovery process is required once a path failure is detected, and this process causes delay and wastage of node resources. A multipath routing scheme is an alternative to maximize the network lifetime. In this paper, we propose an energy-efficient multipath routing protocol, called AOMR-LM (Ad hoc On-demand Multipath Routing with Lifetime Maximization), which preserves the residual energy of nodes and balances the consumed energy to increase the network lifetime. To achieve this goal, we used the residual energy of nodes for calculating the node energy level. The multipath selection mechanism uses this energy level to classify the paths. Two parameters are analyzed: the energy threshold beta and the coefficient alpha. These parameters are required to classify the nodes and to ensure the preservation of node energy. Our protocol improves the performance of mobile ad hoc networks by prolonging the lifetime of the network. This novel protocol has been compared with other protocols: AOMDV and ZD-AOMDV. The protocol performance has been evaluated in terms of network lifetime, energy consumption, and end-to-end delay.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Networking & Internet
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Indoor Localization Systems and Technologies
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks
π
π
The Cartographer
Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-art and Research Challenges
π
π
The Cartographer
Applications of Deep Reinforcement Learning in Communications and Networking: A Survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted