Dimensionality-reduced subspace clustering

July 25, 2015 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Reinhard Heckel, Michael Tschannen, Helmut Bรถlcskei arXiv ID 1507.07105 Category stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat) Cross-listed cs.IT, cs.LG Citations 34 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Subspace clustering refers to the problem of clustering unlabeled high-dimensional data points into a union of low-dimensional linear subspaces, whose number, orientations, and dimensions are all unknown. In practice one may have access to dimensionality-reduced observations of the data only, resulting, e.g., from undersampling due to complexity and speed constraints on the acquisition device or mechanism. More pertinently, even if the high-dimensional data set is available it is often desirable to first project the data points into a lower-dimensional space and to perform clustering there; this reduces storage requirements and computational cost. The purpose of this paper is to quantify the impact of dimensionality reduction through random projection on the performance of three subspace clustering algorithms, all of which are based on principles from sparse signal recovery. Specifically, we analyze the thresholding based subspace clustering (TSC) algorithm, the sparse subspace clustering (SSC) algorithm, and an orthogonal matching pursuit variant thereof (SSC-OMP). We find, for all three algorithms, that dimensionality reduction down to the order of the subspace dimensions is possible without incurring significant performance degradation. Moreover, these results are order-wise optimal in the sense that reducing the dimensionality further leads to a fundamentally ill-posed clustering problem. Our findings carry over to the noisy case as illustrated through analytical results for TSC and simulations for SSC and SSC-OMP. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real data complement our theoretical findings.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning (Stat)

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

Layer Normalization

Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, Geoffrey E. Hinton

stat.ML ๐Ÿ› arXiv ๐Ÿ“š 12.0K cites 10 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted