A Combinatorial Approximation Algorithm for Graph Balancing with Light Hyper Edges

July 27, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Embedded Systems and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Chien-Chung Huang, Sebastian Ott arXiv ID 1507.07396 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 18 Venue Embedded Systems and Applications Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Makespan minimization in restricted assignment $(R|p_{ij}\in \{p_j, \infty\}|C_{\max})$ is a classical problem in the field of machine scheduling. In a landmark paper in 1990 [8], Lenstra, Shmoys, and Tardos gave a 2-approximation algorithm and proved that the problem cannot be approximated within 1.5 unless P=NP. The upper and lower bounds of the problem have been essentially unimproved in the intervening 25 years, despite several remarkable successful attempts in some special cases of the problem [2,4,12] recently. In this paper, we consider a special case called graph-balancing with light hyper edges, where heavy jobs can be assigned to at most two machines while light jobs can be assigned to any number of machines. For this case, we present algorithms with approximation ratios strictly better than 2. Specifically, Two job sizes: Suppose that light jobs have weight $w$ and heavy jobs have weight $W$, and $w < W$. We give a $1.5$-approximation algorithm (note that the current 1.5 lower bound is established in an even more restrictive setting [1,3]). Indeed, depending on the specific values of $w$ and $W$, sometimes our algorithm guarantees sub-1.5 approximation ratios. Arbitrary job sizes: Suppose that $W$ is the largest given weight, heavy jobs have weights in the range of $(Ξ²W, W]$, where $4/7\leq Ξ²< 1$, and light jobs have weights in the range of $(0,Ξ²W]$. We present a $(5/3+Ξ²/3)$-approximation algorithm. Our algorithms are purely combinatorial, without the need of solving a linear program as required in most other known approaches.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted