On the Equivalence among Problems of Bounded Width

September 03, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Embedded Systems and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Yoichi Iwata, Yuichi Yoshida arXiv ID 1509.01014 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 10 Venue Embedded Systems and Applications Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a methodology, called decomposition-based reductions, for showing the equivalence among various problems of bounded-width. First, we show that the following are equivalent for any $Ξ±> 0$: * SAT can be solved in $O^*(2^{Ξ±\mathrm{tw}})$ time, * 3-SAT can be solved in $O^*(2^{Ξ±\mathrm{tw}})$ time, * Max 2-SAT can be solved in $O^*(2^{Ξ±\mathrm{tw}})$ time, * Independent Set can be solved in $O^*(2^{Ξ±\mathrm{tw}})$ time, and * Independent Set can be solved in $O^*(2^{Ξ±\mathrm{cw}})$ time, where tw and cw are the tree-width and clique-width of the instance, respectively. Then, we introduce a new parameterized complexity class EPNL, which includes Set Cover and Directed Hamiltonicity, and show that SAT, 3-SAT, Max 2-SAT, and Independent Set parameterized by path-width are EPNL-complete. This implies that if one of these EPNL-complete problems can be solved in $O^*(c^k)$ time, then any problem in EPNL can be solved in $O^*(c^k)$ time.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted