On the Capacity of Point-to-Point and Multiple-Access Molecular Communications with Ligand-Receptors

September 19, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Molecular Biological and Multi-Scale Communications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Gholamali Aminian, Maryam Farahnak Ghazani, Mahtab Mirmohseni, Masoumeh Nasiri Kenari, Faramarz Fekri arXiv ID 1509.05877 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Cross-listed q-bio.MN Citations 37 Venue IEEE Transactions on Molecular Biological and Multi-Scale Communications Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the bacterial point-to-point and multiple-access molecular communications with ligand-receptors. For the point-to-point communication, we investigate common signaling methods, namely the Level Scenario (LS), which uses one type of a molecule with different concentration levels, and the Type Scenario (TS), which employs multiple types of molecules with a single concentration level. We investigate the trade-offs between the two scenarios from the capacity point of view. We derive an upper bound on the capacity using a Binomial Channel (BIC) model and the symmetrized Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. A lower bound is also derived when the environment noise is negligible. For the TS, we also consider the effect of blocking of a receptor by a different molecule type. Then, we consider multiple-access communications, for which we investigate three scenarios based on molecule and receptor types, i.e., same types of molecules with Different Labeling and Same types of Receptors (DLSR), Different types of Molecules and Receptors (DMDR), and Same types of Molecules and Receptors (SMSR). We investigate the trade-offs among the three scenarios from the total capacity point of view. We derive some inner bounds on the capacity region of these scenarios when the environment noise is negligible.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted