Parameterized Lower Bounds and Dichotomy Results for the NP-completeness of $H$-free Edge Modification Problems

September 29, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors N. R. Aravind, R. B. Sandeep, Naveen Sivadasan arXiv ID 1509.08807 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 9 Venue Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
For a graph $H$, the $H$-free Edge Deletion problem asks whether there exist at most $k$ edges whose deletion from the input graph $G$ results in a graph without any induced copy of $H$. $H$-free Edge Completion and $H$-free Edge Editing are defined similarly where only completion (addition) of edges are allowed in the former and both completion and deletion are allowed in the latter. We completely settle the classical complexities of these problems by proving that $H$-free Edge Deletion is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least two edges, $H$-free Edge Completion is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least two non-edges and $H$-free Edge Editing is NP-complete if and only if $H$ is a graph with at least three vertices. Additionally, we prove that, these NP-complete problems cannot be solved in parameterized subexponential time, i.e., in time $2^{o(k)}\cdot |G|^{O(1)}$, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Furthermore, we obtain implications on the incompressibility of these problems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted