A High-Performance Parallel Algorithm for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization

September 30, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ramakrishnan Kannan, Grey Ballard, Haesun Park arXiv ID 1509.09313 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Citations 73 Venue ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) is the problem of determining two non-negative low rank factors $W$ and $H$, for the given input matrix $A$, such that $A \approx W H$. NMF is a useful tool for many applications in different domains such as topic modeling in text mining, background separation in video analysis, and community detection in social networks. Despite its popularity in the data mining community, there is a lack of efficient parallel software to solve the problem for big datasets. Existing distributed-memory algorithms are limited in terms of performance and applicability, as they are implemented using Hadoop and are designed only for sparse matrices. We propose a distributed-memory parallel algorithm that computes the factorization by iteratively solving alternating non-negative least squares (NLS) subproblems for $W$ and $H$. To our knowledge, our algorithm is the first high-performance parallel algorithm for NMF. It maintains the data and factor matrices in memory (distributed across processors), uses MPI for interprocessor communication, and, in the dense case, provably minimizes communication costs (under mild assumptions). As opposed to previous implementations, our algorithm is also flexible: (1) it performs well for dense and sparse matrices, and (2) it allows the user to choose from among multiple algorithms for solving local NLS subproblems within the alternating iterations. We demonstrate the scalability of our algorithm and compare it with baseline implementations, showing significant performance improvements.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted