On the Placement Delivery Array Design in Centralized Coded Caching Scheme

October 17, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Qifa Yan, Minquan Cheng, Xiaohu Tang, Qingchun Chen arXiv ID 1510.05064 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 283 Venue IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Caching is a promising solution to satisfy the ever increasing demands for the multi-media traffics. In caching networks, coded caching is a recently proposed technique that achieves significant performance gains over the uncoded caching schemes. However, to implement the coded caching schemes, each file has to be split into $F$ packets, which usually increases exponentially with the number of users $K$. Thus, designing caching schemes that decrease the order of $F$ is meaningful for practical implementations. In this paper, by reviewing the Ali-Niesen caching scheme, the placement delivery array (PDA) design problem is firstly formulated to characterize the placement issue and the delivery issue with a single array. Moreover, we show that, through designing appropriate PDA, new centralized coded caching schemes can be discovered. Secondly, it is shown that the Ali-Niesen scheme corresponds to a special class of PDA, which realizes the best coding gain with the least $F$. Thirdly, we present a new construction of PDA for the centralized caching system, wherein the cache size of each user $M$ (identical cache size is assumed at all users) and the number of files $N$ satisfies $M/N=1/q$ or ${(q-1)}/{q}$ ($q$ is an integer such that $q\geq 2$). The new construction can decrease the required $F$ from the order $O\left(e^{K\cdot\left(\frac{M}{N}\ln \frac{N}{M} +(1-\frac{M}{N})\ln \frac{N}{N-M}\right)}\right)$ of Ali-Niesen scheme to $O\left(e^{K\cdot\frac{M}{N}\ln \frac{N}{M}}\right)$ or $O\left(e^{K\cdot(1-\frac{M}{N})\ln\frac{N}{N-M}}\right)$ respectively, while the coding gain loss is only $1$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted