Kolmogorov complexity version of Slepian-Wolf coding
November 11, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Symposium on the Theory of Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Marius Zimand
arXiv ID
1511.03602
Category
cs.IT: Information Theory
Citations
13
Venue
Symposium on the Theory of Computing
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Alice and Bob are given two correlated n-bit strings x_1 and, respectively, x_2, which they want to losslessly compress and send to Zack. They can either collaborate by sharing their strings, or work separately. We show that there is no disadvantage in the second scenario: Alice and Bob, without knowing the other party's string, can achieve almost optimal compression in the sense of Kolmogorov complexity. Furthermore, compression takes polynomial time and can be made at any combination of lengths that satisfy some necessary conditions (modulo additive polylog terms). More precisely, there exist probabilistic algorithms E_1, E_2, and deterministic algorithm D, with E_1 and E_2 running in polynomial time, having the following behavior: if n_1, n_2 are two integers satisfying n_1 + n_2 \geq C(x_1,x_2), n_1 \geq C(x_1 | x_2), n_2 \geq C(x_2 | x_1), then for i \in {1,2}, E_i on input x_i and n_i outputs a string of length n_i + \polylog n such that D on input E_1(x_1), E_2(x_2) reconstructs (x_1,x_2) with high probability (where C(x) denotes the plain Kolmogorov complexity of x, and C(x \mid y) is the complexity of x conditioned by y). Our main result is more general, as it deals with the compression of any constant number of correlated strings. It is an analog in the framework of algorithmic information theory of the classic Slepian-Wolf Theorem, a fundamental result in network information theory, in which x_1 and x_2 are realizations of two discrete random variables formed by drawing independently n times from a joint distribution. Also, in the classical result, the decompressor needs to know the joint distribution of the sources. In our result no type of independence is assumed and the decompressor does not have any apriori information about the sources that are compressed, and it still is the case that distributed compression is on a par with centralized compression.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Information Theory
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Towards Smart and Reconfigurable Environment: Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless Network
π
π
The Cartographer
Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication
π
π
The Cartographer
An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted