GPEC, a real-time capable Tokamak equilibrium code
November 13, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Markus Rampp, Roland Preuss, Rainer Fischer, the ASDEX Upgrade Team
arXiv ID
1511.04203
Category
physics.plasm-ph
Cross-listed
cs.CE,
cs.DC,
physics.comp-ph
Citations
10
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
A new parallel equilibrium reconstruction code for tokamak plasmas is presented. GPEC allows to compute equilibrium flux distributions sufficiently accurate to derive parameters for plasma control within 1 ms of runtime which enables real-time applications at the ASDEX Upgrade experiment (AUG) and other machines with a control cycle of at least this size. The underlying algorithms are based on the well-established offline-analysis code CLISTE, following the classical concept of iteratively solving the Grad-Shafranov equation and feeding in diagnostic signals from the experiment. The new code adopts a hybrid parallelization scheme for computing the equilibrium flux distribution and extends the fast, shared-memory-parallel Poisson solver which we have described previously by a distributed computation of the individual Poisson problems corresponding to different basis functions. The code is based entirely on open-source software components and runs on standard server hardware and software environments. The real-time capability of GPEC is demonstrated by performing an offline-computation of a sequence of 1000 flux distributions which are taken from one second of operation of a typical AUG discharge and deriving the relevant control parameters with a time resolution of a millisecond. On current server hardware the new code allows employing a grid size of 32x64 zones for the spatial discretization and up to 15 basis functions. It takes into account about 90 diagnostic signals while using up to 4 equilibrium iterations and computing more than 20 plasma-control parameters, including the computationally expensive safety-factor q on at least 4 different levels of the normalized flux.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.plasm-ph
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Plasma Surrogate Modelling using Fourier Neural Operators
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Plasma Tomography and Disruption Prediction from Bolometer Data
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Machine learning plasma-surface interface for coupling sputtering and gas-phase transport simulations
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Enhancing predictive capabilities in fusion burning plasmas through surrogate-based optimization in core transport solvers
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Extracting Electron Scattering Cross Sections from Swarm Data using Deep Neural Networks
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted