A Polynomial Lower Bound for Testing Monotonicity

November 16, 2015 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Symposium on the Theory of Computing

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Aleksandrs Belovs, Eric Blais arXiv ID 1511.05053 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.DS Citations 54 Venue Symposium on the Theory of Computing Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
We show that every algorithm for testing $n$-variate Boolean functions for monotonicity must have query complexity $\tildeฮฉ(n^{1/4})$. All previous lower bounds for this problem were designed for non-adaptive algorithms and, as a result, the best previous lower bound for general (possibly adaptive) monotonicity testers was only $ฮฉ(\log n)$. Combined with the query complexity of the non-adaptive monotonicity tester of Khot, Minzer, and Safra (FOCS 2015), our lower bound shows that adaptivity can result in at most a quadratic reduction in the query complexity for testing monotonicity. By contrast, we show that there is an exponential gap between the query complexity of adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms for testing regular linear threshold functions (LTFs) for monotonicity. Chen, De, Servedio, and Tan (STOC 2015) recently showed that non-adaptive algorithms require almost $ฮฉ(n^{1/2})$ queries for this task. We introduce a new adaptive monotonicity testing algorithm which has query complexity $O(\log n)$ when the input is a regular LTF.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity