Tight Running Time Lower Bounds for Vertex Deletion Problems

November 17, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Transactions on Computation Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Christian Komusiewicz arXiv ID 1511.05449 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.DM Citations 12 Venue ACM Transactions on Computation Theory Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
For a graph class $Ξ $, the $Ξ $-Vertex Deletion problem has as input an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $k$ and asks whether there is a set of at most $k$ vertices that can be deleted from $G$ such that the resulting graph is a member of $Ξ $. By a classic result of Lewis and Yannakakis [J. Comput. Syst. Sci. '80], $Ξ $-Vertex Deletion is NP-hard for all hereditary properties $Ξ $. We adapt the original NP-hardness construction to show that under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) tight complexity results can be obtained. We show that $Ξ $-Vertex Deletion does not admit a $2^{o(n)}$-time algorithm where $n$ is the number of vertices in $G$. We also obtain a dichotomy for running time bounds that include the number $m$ of edges in the input graph: On the one hand, if $Ξ $ contains all independent sets, then there is no $2^{o(n+m)}$-time algorithm for $Ξ $-Vertex Deletion. On the other hand, if there is a fixed independent set that is not contained in $Ξ $ and containment in $Ξ $ can determined in $2^{O(n)}$ time or $2^{o(m)}$ time, then $Ξ $-Vertex Deletion can be solved in $2^{O(\sqrt{m})}+O(n)$ or $2^{o({m})}+O(n)$ time, respectively. We also consider restrictions on the domain of the input graph $G$. For example, we obtain that $Ξ $-Vertex Deletion cannot be solved in $2^{o(\sqrt{n})}$ time if $G$ is planar and $Ξ $ is hereditary and contains and excludes infinitely many planar graphs. Finally, we provide similar results for the problem variant where the deleted vertex set has to induce a connected graph.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted