Online (and Offline) Robust PCA: Novel Algorithms and Performance Guarantees

January 29, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jinchun Zhan, Brian Lois, Namrata Vaswani arXiv ID 1601.07985 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 44 Venue International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In this work, we study the online robust principal components' analysis (RPCA) problem. In recent work, RPCA has been defined as a problem of separating a low-rank matrix (true data), $L$, and a sparse matrix (outliers), $S$, from their sum, $M:=L + S$. A more general version of this problem is to recover $L$ and $S$ from $M:=L + S + W$ where $W$ is the matrix of unstructured small noise/corruptions. An important application where this problem occurs is in video analytics in trying to separate sparse foregrounds (e.g., moving objects) from slowly changing backgrounds. While there has been a large amount of recent work on solutions and guarantees for the batch RPCA problem, the online problem is largely open."Online" RPCA is the problem of doing the above on-the-fly with the extra assumptions that the initial subspace is accurately known and that the subspace from which $l_t$ is generated changes slowly over time. We develop and study a novel "online" RPCA algorithm based on the recently introduced Recursive Projected Compressive Sensing (ReProCS) framework. Our algorithm improves upon the original ReProCS algorithm and it also returns even more accurate offline estimates. The key contribution of this work is a correctness result (complete performance guarantee) for this algorithm under reasonably mild assumptions. By using extra assumptions -- accurate initial subspace knowledge, slow subspace change, and clustered eigenvalues -- we are able to remove one important limitation of batch RPCA results and two key limitations of a recent result for ReProCS for online RPCA. To our knowledge, this work is among the first few correctness results for online RPCA. Most earlier results were only partial results, i.e., they required an assumption on intermediate algorithm estimates.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Information Theory

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted