Interactive algorithms: from pool to stream

February 02, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sivan Sabato, Tom Hess arXiv ID 1602.01132 Category stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat) Cross-listed cs.LG, math.ST Citations 14 Venue Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We consider interactive algorithms in the pool-based setting, and in the stream-based setting. Interactive algorithms observe suggested elements (representing actions or queries), and interactively select some of them and receive responses. Pool-based algorithms can select elements at any order, while stream-based algorithms observe elements in sequence, and can only select elements immediately after observing them. We assume that the suggested elements are generated independently from some source distribution, and ask what is the stream size required for emulating a pool algorithm with a given pool size. We provide algorithms and matching lower bounds for general pool algorithms, and for utility-based pool algorithms. We further show that a maximal gap between the two settings exists also in the special case of active learning for binary classification.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Machine Learning (Stat)

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Graph Attention Networks

Petar VeličkoviΔ‡, Guillem Cucurull, ... (+4 more)

stat.ML πŸ› ICLR πŸ“š 24.7K cites 8 years ago
R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Layer Normalization

Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, Geoffrey E. Hinton

stat.ML πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 12.0K cites 9 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted