Distributed Strong Diameter Network Decomposition
February 17, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Michael Elkin, Ofer Neiman
arXiv ID
1602.05437
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
15
Venue
ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
For a pair of positive parameters $D,Ο$, a partition ${\cal P}$ of the vertex set $V$ of an $n$-vertex graph $G = (V,E)$ into disjoint clusters of diameter at most $D$ each is called a $(D,Ο)$ network decomposition, if the supergraph ${\cal G}({\cal P})$, obtained by contracting each of the clusters of ${\cal P}$, can be properly $Ο$-colored. The decomposition ${\cal P}$ is said to be strong (resp., weak) if each of the clusters has strong (resp., weak) diameter at most $D$, i.e., if for every cluster $C \in {\cal P}$ and every two vertices $u,v \in C$, the distance between them in the induced graph $G(C)$ of $C$ (resp., in $G$) is at most $D$. Network decomposition is a powerful construct, very useful in distributed computing and beyond. It was shown by Awerbuch \etal \cite{AGLP89} and Panconesi and Srinivasan \cite{PS92}, that strong $(2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})},2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})})$ network decompositions can be computed in $2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$ distributed time. Linial and Saks \cite{LS93} devised an ingenious randomized algorithm that constructs {\em weak} $(O(\log n),O(\log n))$ network decompositions in $O(\log^2 n)$ time. It was however open till now if {\em strong} network decompositions with both parameters $2^{o(\sqrt{\log n})}$ can be constructed in distributed $2^{o(\sqrt{\log n})}$ time. In this paper we answer this long-standing open question in the affirmative, and show that strong $(O(\log n),O(\log n))$ network decompositions can be computed in $O(\log^2 n)$ time. We also present a tradeoff between parameters of our network decomposition. Our work is inspired by and relies on the "shifted shortest path approach", due to Blelloch \etal \cite{BGKMPT11}, and Miller \etal \cite{MPX13}. These authors developed this approach for PRAM algorithms for padded partitions. We adapt their approach to network decompositions in the distributed model of computation.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted