Exact Weighted Minwise Hashing in Constant Time

February 26, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Anshumali Shrivastava arXiv ID 1602.08393 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.IR Citations 10 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Weighted minwise hashing (WMH) is one of the fundamental subroutine, required by many celebrated approximation algorithms, commonly adopted in industrial practice for large scale-search and learning. The resource bottleneck of the algorithms is the computation of multiple (typically a few hundreds to thousands) independent hashes of the data. The fastest hashing algorithm is by Ioffe \cite{Proc:Ioffe_ICDM10}, which requires one pass over the entire data vector, $O(d)$ ($d$ is the number of non-zeros), for computing one hash. However, the requirement of multiple hashes demands hundreds or thousands passes over the data. This is very costly for modern massive dataset. In this work, we break this expensive barrier and show an expected constant amortized time algorithm which computes $k$ independent and unbiased WMH in time $O(k)$ instead of $O(dk)$ required by Ioffe's method. Moreover, our proposal only needs a few bits (5 - 9 bits) of storage per hash value compared to around $64$ bits required by the state-of-art-methodologies. Experimental evaluations, on real datasets, show that for computing 500 WMH, our proposal can be 60000x faster than the Ioffe's method without losing any accuracy. Our method is also around 100x faster than approximate heuristics capitalizing on the efficient "densified" one permutation hashing schemes \cite{Proc:OneHashLSH_ICML14}. Given the simplicity of our approach and its significant advantages, we hope that it will replace existing implementations in practice.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted