New Algorithms for Maximum Disjoint Paths Based on Tree-Likeness
March 05, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Mathematical programming
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Krzysztof Fleszar, Matthias Mnich, Joachim Spoerhase
arXiv ID
1603.01740
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
24
Venue
Mathematical programming
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We study the classical NP-hard problems of finding maximum-size subsets from given sets of $k$ terminal pairs that can be routed via edge-disjoint paths (MaxEDP) or node-disjoint paths (MaxNDP) in a given graph. The approximability of MaxEDP/NDP is currently not well understood; the best known lower bound is $Ξ©(\log^{1/2-Ξ΅}{n})$, assuming NP$~\not\subseteq~$ZPTIME$(n^{\mathrm{poly}\log n})$. This constitutes a significant gap to the best known approximation upper bound of $O(\sqrt{n})$ due to Chekuri et al. (2006) and closing this gap is currently one of the big open problems in approximation algorithms. In their seminal paper, Raghavan and Thompson (Combinatorica, 1987) introduce the technique of randomized rounding for LPs; their technique gives an $O(1)$-approximation when edges (or nodes) may be used by $O(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n})$ paths. In this paper, we strengthen the above fundamental results. We provide new bounds formulated in terms of the feedback vertex set number $r$ of a graph, which measures its vertex deletion distance to a forest. In particular, we obtain the following. * For MaxEDP, we give an $O(\sqrt{r}\cdot \log^{1.5}{kr})$-approximation algorithm. As $r\leq n$, up to logarithmic factors, our result strengthens the best known ratio $O(\sqrt{n})$ due to Chekuri et al. * Further, we show how to route $Ξ©(\mathrm{OPT})$ pairs with congestion $O(\frac{\log{kr}}{\log\log{kr}})$, strengthening the bound obtained by the classic approach of Raghavan and Thompson. * For MaxNDP, we give an algorithm that gives the optimal answer in time $(k+r)^{O(r)}\cdot n$. If $r$ is at most triple-exponential in $k$, this improves the best known algorithm for MaxNDP with parameter $k$, by Kawarabayashi and Wollan (STOC 2010). We complement these positive results by proving that MaxEDP is NP-hard even for $r=1$, and MaxNDP is W$[1]$-hard for parameter $r$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted