A Stochastic Model for Quantitative Security Analyses of Networked Systems
March 28, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Xiaohu Li, Paul Parker, Shouhuai Xu
arXiv ID
1603.08300
Category
cs.CR: Cryptography & Security
Cross-listed
cs.SI
Citations
57
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Traditional security analyses are often geared towards cryptographic primitives or protocols. Although such analyses are necessary, they cannot address a defender's need for insight into {\em which aspects of a networked system having a significant impact on its security, and how to tune its configurations or parameters so as to improve security}. This question is known to be notoriously difficult to answer, and the state-of-the-art is that we know little about it. Towards ultimately addressing this question, this paper presents a stochastic model for quantifying security of networked systems. The resulting model captures two aspects of a networked system: (1) the strength of deployed security mechanisms such as intrusion detection systems, and (2) the underlying {\em vulnerability graph}, which reflects how attacks may proceed. The resulting model brings the following insights: (1) How should a defender "tune" system configurations (e.g., network topology) so as to improve security? (2) How should a defender "tune" system parameters (e.g., by upgrading which security mechanisms) so as to improve security? (3) Under what conditions is the steady-state number of compromised entities of interest below a given threshold with a high probability? Simulation studies are conducted to confirm the analytic results, and to show the tightness of the bounds of certain important metric that cannot be resolved analytically.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Cryptography & Security
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
How To Backdoor Federated Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted