A Single-Letter Upper Bound on the Feedback Capacity of Unifilar Finite-State Channels

April 07, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Oron Sabag, Haim H. Permuter, Henry D. Pfister arXiv ID 1604.01878 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 32 Venue IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
An upper bound on the feedback capacity of unifilar finite-state channels (FSCs) is derived. A new technique, called the $Q$-contexts, is based on a construction of a directed graph that is used to quantize recursively the receiver's output sequences to a finite set of contexts. For any choice of $Q$-graph, the feedback capacity is bounded by a single-letter expression, $C_\text{fb}\leq \sup I(X,S;Y|Q)$, where the supremum is over $P_{X|S,Q}$ and the distribution of $(S,Q)$ is their stationary distribution. It is shown that the bound is tight for all unifilar FSCs where feedback capacity is known: channels where the state is a function of the outputs, the trapdoor channel, Ising channels, the no-consecutive-ones input-constrained erasure channel and for the memoryless channel. Its efficiency is also demonstrated by deriving a new capacity result for the dicode erasure channel (DEC); the upper bound is obtained directly from the above expression and its tightness is concluded with a general sufficient condition on the optimality of the upper bound. This sufficient condition is based on a fixed point principle of the BCJR equation and, indeed, formulated as a simple lower bound on feedback capacity of unifilar FSCs for arbitrary $Q$-graphs. This upper bound indicates that a single-letter expression might exist for the capacity of finite-state channels with or without feedback based on a construction of auxiliary random variable with specified structure, such as $Q$-graph, and not with i.i.d distribution. The upper bound also serves as a non-trivial bound on the capacity of channels without feedback, a problem that is still open.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted