Zero-knowledge proof systems for QMA

April 11, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Anne Broadbent, Zhengfeng Ji, Fang Song, John Watrous arXiv ID 1604.02804 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.CR Citations 56 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Prior work has established that all problems in NP admit classical zero-knowledge proof systems, and under reasonable hardness assumptions for quantum computations, these proof systems can be made secure against quantum attacks. We prove a result representing a further quantum generalization of this fact, which is that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum zero-knowledge proof system. More specifically, assuming the existence of an unconditionally binding and quantum computationally concealing commitment scheme, we prove that every problem in the complexity class QMA has a quantum interactive proof system that is zero-knowledge with respect to efficient quantum computations. Our QMA proof system is sound against arbitrary quantum provers, but only requires an honest prover to perform polynomial-time quantum computations, provided that it holds a quantum witness for a given instance of the QMA problem under consideration. The proof system relies on a new variant of the QMA-complete local Hamiltonian problem in which the local terms are described by Clifford operations and standard basis measurements. We believe that the QMA-completeness of this problem may have other uses in quantum complexity.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Variational Quantum Algorithms

M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, ... (+9 more)

quant-ph πŸ› Nature Reviews Physics πŸ“š 3.3K cites 5 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted