Dynamic Graph Stream Algorithms in $o(n)$ Space

April 30, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Algorithmica

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zengfeng Huang, Pan Peng arXiv ID 1605.00089 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 28 Venue Algorithmica Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In this paper we study graph problems in dynamic streaming model, where the input is defined by a sequence of edge insertions and deletions. As many natural problems require $Ξ©(n)$ space, where $n$ is the number of vertices, existing works mainly focused on designing $\tilde{O}(n)$ space algorithms. Although sublinear in the number of edges for dense graphs, it could still be too large for many applications (e.g. $n$ is huge or the graph is sparse). In this work, we give single-pass algorithms beating this space barrier for two classes of problems. We present $o(n)$ space algorithms for estimating the number of connected components with additive error $\varepsilon n$ and $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximating the weight of minimum spanning tree, for any small constant $\varepsilon>0$. The latter improves previous $\tilde{O}(n)$ space algorithm given by Ahn et al. (SODA 2012) for connected graphs with bounded edge weights. We initiate the study of approximate graph property testing in the dynamic streaming model, where we want to distinguish graphs satisfying the property from graphs that are $\varepsilon$-far from having the property. We consider the problem of testing $k$-edge connectivity, $k$-vertex connectivity, cycle-freeness and bipartiteness (of planar graphs), for which, we provide algorithms using roughly $\tilde{O}(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ space, which is $o(n)$ for any constant $\varepsilon$. To complement our algorithms, we present $Ξ©(n^{1-O(\varepsilon)})$ space lower bounds for these problems, which show that such a dependence on $\varepsilon$ is necessary.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted