Do Users Focus on the Correct Cues to Differentiate Between Phishing and Genuine Emails?

May 16, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACIS

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Kathryn Parsons, Marcus Butavicius, Malcolm Pattinson, Dragana Calic, Agata Mccormac, Cate Jerram arXiv ID 1605.04717 Category cs.CY: Computers & Society Cross-listed cs.CR Citations 41 Venue ACIS Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
This paper examines the cues that typically differentiate phishing emails from genuine emails. The research is conducted in two stages. In the first stage, we identify the cues that actually differentiate between phishing and genuine emails. These are the consistency and personalisation of the message, the perceived legitimacy of links and sender, and the presence of spelling or grammatical irregularities. In the second stage, we identify the cues that participants use to differentiate between phishing and genuine emails. This revealed that participants often use cues that are not good indicators of whether an email is phishing or genuine. This includes the presence of legal disclaimers, the quality of visual presentation, and the positive consequences emphasised in the email. This study has implications for education and training and provides a basis for the design and development of targeted and more relevant training and risk communication strategies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computers & Society

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Green AI

Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, ... (+2 more)

cs.CY πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 1.5K cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted