Multi-body Non-rigid Structure-from-Motion
July 15, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on 3D Vision
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Suryansh Kumar, Yuchao Dai, Hongdong Li
arXiv ID
1607.04515
Category
cs.CV: Computer Vision
Citations
47
Venue
International Conference on 3D Vision
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
Conventional structure-from-motion (SFM) research is primarily concerned with the 3D reconstruction of a single, rigidly moving object seen by a static camera, or a static and rigid scene observed by a moving camera --in both cases there are only one relative rigid motion involved. Recent progress have extended SFM to the areas of {multi-body SFM} (where there are {multiple rigid} relative motions in the scene), as well as {non-rigid SFM} (where there is a single non-rigid, deformable object or scene). Along this line of thinking, there is apparently a missing gap of "multi-body non-rigid SFM", in which the task would be to jointly reconstruct and segment multiple 3D structures of the multiple, non-rigid objects or deformable scenes from images. Such a multi-body non-rigid scenario is common in reality (e.g. two persons shaking hands, multi-person social event), and how to solve it represents a natural {next-step} in SFM research. By leveraging recent results of subspace clustering, this paper proposes, for the first time, an effective framework for multi-body NRSFM, which simultaneously reconstructs and segments each 3D trajectory into their respective low-dimensional subspace. Under our formulation, 3D trajectories for each non-rigid structure can be well approximated with a sparse affine combination of other 3D trajectories from the same structure (self-expressiveness). We solve the resultant optimization with the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real data sequences. Our method clearly outperforms other alternative methods, such as first clustering the 2D feature tracks to groups and then doing non-rigid reconstruction in each group or first conducting 3D reconstruction by using single subspace assumption and then clustering the 3D trajectories into groups.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computer Vision
π
π
Old Age
π
π
Old Age
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
π
π
Old Age
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
π
π
Old Age
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
π
π
Old Age
Fast R-CNN
π
π
Old Age
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted