Automatic Environmental Sound Recognition: Performance versus Computational Cost

July 15, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Siddharth Sigtia, Adam M. Stark, Sacha Krstulovic, Mark D. Plumbley arXiv ID 1607.04589 Category cs.SD: Sound Cross-listed cs.LG, cs.NE Citations 79 Venue IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
In the context of the Internet of Things (IoT), sound sensing applications are required to run on embedded platforms where notions of product pricing and form factor impose hard constraints on the available computing power. Whereas Automatic Environmental Sound Recognition (AESR) algorithms are most often developed with limited consideration for computational cost, this article seeks which AESR algorithm can make the most of a limited amount of computing power by comparing the sound classification performance em as a function of its computational cost. Results suggest that Deep Neural Networks yield the best ratio of sound classification accuracy across a range of computational costs, while Gaussian Mixture Models offer a reasonable accuracy at a consistently small cost, and Support Vector Machines stand between both in terms of compromise between accuracy and computational cost.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Sound

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted