Finding Large Set Covers Faster via the Representation Method

August 11, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Embedded Systems and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jesper Nederlof arXiv ID 1608.03439 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 14 Venue Embedded Systems and Applications Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The worst-case fastest known algorithm for the Set Cover problem on universes with $n$ elements still essentially is the simple $O^*(2^n)$-time dynamic programming algorithm, and no non-trivial consequences of an $O^*(1.01^n)$-time algorithm are known. Motivated by this chasm, we study the following natural question: Which instances of Set Cover can we solve faster than the simple dynamic programming algorithm? Specifically, we give a Monte Carlo algorithm that determines the existence of a set cover of size $Οƒn$ in $O^*(2^{(1-Ξ©(Οƒ^4))n})$ time. Our approach is also applicable to Set Cover instances with exponentially many sets: By reducing the task of finding the chromatic number $Ο‡(G)$ of a given $n$-vertex graph $G$ to Set Cover in the natural way, we show there is an $O^*(2^{(1-Ξ©(Οƒ^4))n})$-time randomized algorithm that given integer $s=Οƒn$, outputs NO if $Ο‡(G) > s$ and YES with constant probability if $Ο‡(G)\leq s-1$. On a high level, our results are inspired by the `representation method' of Howgrave-Graham and Joux~[EUROCRYPT'10] and obtained by only evaluating a randomly sampled subset of the table entries of a dynamic programming algorithm.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted