Super-resolution community detection for layer-aggregated multilayer networks
September 14, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Physical Review X
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Dane Taylor, Rajmonda S. Caceres, Peter J. Mucha
arXiv ID
1609.04376
Category
cs.SI: Social & Info Networks
Cross-listed
physics.soc-ph
Citations
40
Venue
Physical Review X
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
Applied network science often involves preprocessing network data before applying a network-analysis method, and there is typically a theoretical disconnect between these steps. For example, it is common to aggregate time-varying network data into windows prior to analysis, and the tradeoffs of this preprocessing are not well understood. Focusing on the problem of detecting small communities in multilayer networks, we study the effects of layer aggregation by developing random-matrix theory for modularity matrices associated with layer-aggregated networks with $N$ nodes and $L$ layers, which are drawn from an ensemble of ErdΕs-RΓ©nyi networks. We study phase transitions in which eigenvectors localize onto communities (allowing their detection) and which occur for a given community provided its size surpasses a detectability limit $K^*$. When layers are aggregated via a summation, we obtain $K^*\varpropto \mathcal{O}(\sqrt{NL}/T)$, where $T$ is the number of layers across which the community persists. Interestingly, if $T$ is allowed to vary with $L$ then summation-based layer aggregation enhances small-community detection even if the community persists across a vanishing fraction of layers, provided that $T/L$ decays more slowly than $ \mathcal{O}(L^{-1/2})$. Moreover, we find that thresholding the summation can in some cases cause $K^*$ to decay exponentially, decreasing by orders of magnitude in a phenomenon we call super-resolution community detection. That is, layer aggregation with thresholding is a nonlinear data filter enabling detection of communities that are otherwise too small to detect. Importantly, different thresholds generally enhance the detectability of communities having different properties, illustrating that community detection can be obscured if one analyzes network data using a single threshold.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Social & Info Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Natural Scales in Geographical Patterns
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applications
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted