Performance Comparison of Short-Length Error-Correcting Codes

September 26, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors J. Van Wonterghem, A. Alloum, J. J. Boutros, M. Moeneclaey arXiv ID 1609.07907 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 55 Venue IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We compare the performance of short-length linear binary codes on the binary erasure channel and the binary-input Gaussian channel. We use a universal decoder that can decode any linear binary block code: Gaussian-elimination based Maximum-Likelihood decoder on the erasure channel and probabilistic Ordered Statistics Decoder on the Gaussian channel. As such we compare codes and not decoders. The word error rate versus the channel parameter is found for LDPC, Reed-Muller, Polar, and BCH codes at length 256 bits. BCH codes outperform other codes in absence of cyclic redundancy check. Under joint decoding, the concatenation of a cyclic redundancy check makes all codes perform very close to optimal lower bounds.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted