Sufficiently Myopic Adversaries are Blind
October 05, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on Information Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Bikash Kumar Dey, Sidharth Jaggi, Michael Langberg
arXiv ID
1610.01287
Category
cs.IT: Information Theory
Citations
39
Venue
International Symposium on Information Theory
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
In this work we consider a communication problem in which a sender, Alice, wishes to communicate with a receiver, Bob, over a channel controlled by an adversarial jammer, James, who is {\em myopic}. Roughly speaking, for blocklength $n$, the codeword $X^n$ transmitted by Alice is corrupted by James who must base his adversarial decisions (of which locations of $X^n$ to corrupt and how to corrupt them) not on the codeword $X^n$ but on $Z^n$, an image of $X^n$ through a noisy memoryless channel. More specifically, our communication model may be described by two channels. A memoryless channel $p(z|x)$ from Alice to James, and an {\it Arbitrarily Varying Channel} from Alice to Bob, $p(y|x,s)$ governed by a state $X^n$ determined by James. In standard adversarial channels the states $S^n$ may depend on the codeword $X^n$, but in our setting $S^n$ depends only on James's view $Z^n$. The myopic channel captures a broad range of channels and bridges between the standard models of memoryless and adversarial (zero-error) channels. In this work we present upper and lower bounds on the capacity of myopic channels. For a number of special cases of interest we show that our bounds are tight. We extend our results to the setting of {\em secure} communication in which we require that the transmitted message remain secret from James. For example, we show that if (i) James may flip at most a $p$ fraction of the bits communicated between Alice and Bob, and (ii) James views $X^n$ through a binary symmetric channel with parameter $q$, then once James is "sufficiently myopic" (in this case, when $q>p$), then the optimal communication rate is that of an adversary who is "blind" (that is, an adversary that does not see $X^n$ at all), which is $1-H(p)$ for standard communication, and $H(q)-H(p)$ for secure communication. A similar phenomenon exists for our general model of communication.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Information Theory
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Vision of 6G Wireless Systems: Applications, Trends, Technologies, and Open Research Problems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Towards Smart and Reconfigurable Environment: Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless Network
π
π
The Cartographer
Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Communication
π
π
The Cartographer
An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted