Parallelizing Stochastic Gradient Descent for Least Squares Regression: mini-batching, averaging, and model misspecification
October 12, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Prateek Jain, Sham M. Kakade, Rahul Kidambi, Praneeth Netrapalli, Aaron Sidford
arXiv ID
1610.03774
Category
stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat)
Cross-listed
cs.DS,
cs.LG
Citations
37
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
This work characterizes the benefits of averaging schemes widely used in conjunction with stochastic gradient descent (SGD). In particular, this work provides a sharp analysis of: (1) mini-batching, a method of averaging many samples of a stochastic gradient to both reduce the variance of the stochastic gradient estimate and for parallelizing SGD and (2) tail-averaging, a method involving averaging the final few iterates of SGD to decrease the variance in SGD's final iterate. This work presents non-asymptotic excess risk bounds for these schemes for the stochastic approximation problem of least squares regression. Furthermore, this work establishes a precise problem-dependent extent to which mini-batch SGD yields provable near-linear parallelization speedups over SGD with batch size one. This allows for understanding learning rate versus batch size tradeoffs for the final iterate of an SGD method. These results are then utilized in providing a highly parallelizable SGD method that obtains the minimax risk with nearly the same number of serial updates as batch gradient descent, improving significantly over existing SGD methods. A non-asymptotic analysis of communication efficient parallelization schemes such as model-averaging/parameter mixing methods is then provided. Finally, this work sheds light on some fundamental differences in SGD's behavior when dealing with agnostic noise in the (non-realizable) least squares regression problem. In particular, the work shows that the stepsizes that ensure minimax risk for the agnostic case must be a function of the noise properties. This paper builds on the operator view of analyzing SGD methods, introduced by Defossez and Bach (2015), followed by developing a novel analysis in bounding these operators to characterize the excess risk. These techniques are of broader interest in analyzing computational aspects of stochastic approximation.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Machine Learning (Stat)
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Layer Normalization
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows
๐
๐
The Cartographer
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted