General and Fractional Hypertree Decompositions: Hard and Easy Cases

November 03, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Alberto Mendelzon Workshop on Foundations of Data Management

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Wolfgang Fischl, Georg Gottlob, Reinhard Pichler arXiv ID 1611.01090 Category cs.DB: Databases Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 45 Venue Alberto Mendelzon Workshop on Foundations of Data Management Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Hypertree decompositions, as well as the more powerful generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs), and the yet more general fractional hypertree decompositions (FHD) are hypergraph decomposition methods successfully used for answering conjunctive queries and for the solution of constraint satisfaction problems. Every hypergraph H has a width relative to each of these decomposition methods: its hypertree width hw(H), its generalized hypertree width ghw(H), and its fractional hypertree width fhw(H), respectively. It is known that hw(H) <= k can be checked in polynomial time for fixed k, while checking ghw(H) <= k is NP-complete for any k greater than or equal to 3. The complexity of checking fhw(H) <= k for a fixed k has been open for more than a decade. We settle this open problem by showing that checking fhw(H) <= k is NP-complete, even for k=2. The same construction allows us to prove also the NP-completeness of checking ghw(H) <= k for k=2. After proving these hardness results, we identify meaningful restrictions, for which checking for bounded ghw or fhw becomes tractable.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Databases

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted