"Influence Sketching": Finding Influential Samples In Large-Scale Regressions
November 17, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Mike Wojnowicz, Ben Cruz, Xuan Zhao, Brian Wallace, Matt Wolff, Jay Luan, Caleb Crable
arXiv ID
1611.05923
Category
stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat)
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
35
Venue
2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
Last Checked
6 months ago
Abstract
There is an especially strong need in modern large-scale data analysis to prioritize samples for manual inspection. For example, the inspection could target important mislabeled samples or key vulnerabilities exploitable by an adversarial attack. In order to solve the "needle in the haystack" problem of which samples to inspect, we develop a new scalable version of Cook's distance, a classical statistical technique for identifying samples which unusually strongly impact the fit of a regression model (and its downstream predictions). In order to scale this technique up to very large and high-dimensional datasets, we introduce a new algorithm which we call "influence sketching." Influence sketching embeds random projections within the influence computation; in particular, the influence score is calculated using the randomly projected pseudo-dataset from the post-convergence Generalized Linear Model (GLM). We validate that influence sketching can reliably and successfully discover influential samples by applying the technique to a malware detection dataset of over 2 million executable files, each represented with almost 100,000 features. For example, we find that randomly deleting approximately 10% of training samples reduces predictive accuracy only slightly from 99.47% to 99.45%, whereas deleting the same number of samples with high influence sketch scores reduces predictive accuracy all the way down to 90.24%. Moreover, we find that influential samples are especially likely to be mislabeled. In the case study, we manually inspect the most influential samples, and find that influence sketching pointed us to new, previously unidentified pieces of malware.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Machine Learning (Stat)
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Layer Normalization
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows
๐
๐
The Cartographer
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted