On preparing ground states of gapped Hamiltonians: An efficient Quantum LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma

November 25, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors AndrΓ‘s GilyΓ©n, Or Sattath arXiv ID 1611.08571 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 16 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
A frustration-free local Hamiltonian has the property that its ground state minimises the energy of all local terms simultaneously. In general, even deciding whether a Hamiltonian is frustration-free is a hard task, as it is closely related to the QMA1-complete quantum satisfiability problem (QSAT) -- the quantum analogue of SAT, which is the archetypal NP-complete problem in classical computer science. This connection shows that the frustration-free property is not only relevant to physics but also to computer science. The Quantum LovΓ‘sz Local Lemma (QLLL) provides a sufficient condition for frustration-freeness. A natural question is whether there is an efficient way to prepare a frustration-free state under the conditions of the QLLL. Previous results showed that the answer is positive if all local terms commute. In this work we improve on the previous constructive results by designing an algorithm that works efficiently for non-commuting terms as well, assuming that the system is "uniformly" gapped, by which we mean that the system and all its subsystems have an inverse polynomial energy gap. Also, our analysis works under the most general condition for the QLLL, known as Shearer's bound. Similarly to the previous results, our algorithm has the charming feature that it uses only local measurement operations corresponding to the local Hamiltonian terms.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted