Lower Bounds for Differential Privacy from Gaussian Width

December 09, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Computational Geometry

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Assimakis Kattis, Aleksandar Nikolov arXiv ID 1612.02914 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 12 Venue International Symposium on Computational Geometry Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study the optimal sample complexity of a given workload of linear queries under the constraints of differential privacy. The sample complexity of a query answering mechanism under error parameter $Ξ±$ is the smallest $n$ such that the mechanism answers the workload with error at most $Ξ±$ on any database of size $n$. Following a line of research started by Hardt and Talwar [STOC 2010], we analyze sample complexity using the tools of asymptotic convex geometry. We study the sensitivity polytope, a natural convex body associated with a query workload that quantifies how query answers can change between neighboring databases. This is the information that, roughly speaking, is protected by a differentially private algorithm, and, for this reason, we expect that a "bigger" sensitivity polytope implies larger sample complexity. Our results identify the mean Gaussian width as an appropriate measure of the size of the polytope, and show sample complexity lower bounds in terms of this quantity. Our lower bounds completely characterize the workloads for which the Gaussian noise mechanism is optimal up to constants as those having asymptotically maximal Gaussian width. Our techniques also yield an alternative proof of Pisier's Volume Number Theorem which also suggests an approach to improving the parameters of the theorem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted