A Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of 8 Clear Sky Models

December 13, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Eric Bruneton arXiv ID 1612.04336 Category cs.GR: Graphics Citations 33 Venue IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
We provide a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of 8 clear sky models used in Computer Graphics. We compare the models with each other as well as with measurements and with a reference model from the physics community. After a short summary of the physics of the problem, we present the measurements and the reference model, and how we "invert" it to get the model parameters. We then give an overview of each CG model, and detail its scope, its algorithmic complexity, and its results using the same parameters as in the reference model. We also compare the models with a perceptual study. Our quantitative results confirm that the less simplifications and approximations are used to solve the physical equations, the more accurate are the results. We conclude with a discussion of the advantages and drawbacks of each model, and how to further improve their accuracy.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Graphics

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Everybody Dance Now

Caroline Chan, Shiry Ginosar, ... (+2 more)

cs.GR πŸ› ICCV πŸ“š 820 cites 8 years ago
R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Animating Human Athletics

Jessica K. Hodgins, Wayne L. Wooten, ... (+2 more)

cs.GR πŸ› SIGGRAPH πŸ“š 765 cites 3 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted