Stacking machine learning classifiers to identify Higgs bosons at the LHC

December 21, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alexandre Alves arXiv ID 1612.07725 Category hep-ph Cross-listed cs.LG, physics.data-an Citations 32 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been employed in the problem of classifying signal and background events with high accuracy in particle physics. In this paper, we compare the performance of a widespread ML technique, namely, \emph{stacked generalization}, against the results of two state-of-art algorithms: (1) a deep neural network (DNN) in the task of discovering a new neutral Higgs boson and (2) a scalable machine learning system for tree boosting, in the Standard Model Higgs to tau leptons channel, both at the 8 TeV LHC. In a cut-and-count analysis, \emph{stacking} three algorithms performed around 16\% worse than DNN but demanding far less computation efforts, however, the same \emph{stacking} outperforms boosted decision trees. Using the stacked classifiers in a multivariate statistical analysis (MVA), on the other hand, significantly enhances the statistical significance compared to cut-and-count in both Higgs processes, suggesting that combining an ensemble of simpler and faster ML algorithms with MVA tools is a better approach than building a complex state-of-art algorithm for cut-and-count.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” hep-ph

R.I.P. ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted

How to GAN away Detector Effects

Marco Bellagente, Anja Butter, ... (+3 more)

hep-ph ๐Ÿ› SciPost Physics ๐Ÿ“š 100 cites 6 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted