Counterfactual Prediction with Deep Instrumental Variables Networks

December 30, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jason Hartford, Greg Lewis, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Matt Taddy arXiv ID 1612.09596 Category stat.AP Cross-listed cs.LG, stat.ML Citations 49 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We are in the middle of a remarkable rise in the use and capability of artificial intelligence. Much of this growth has been fueled by the success of deep learning architectures: models that map from observables to outputs via multiple layers of latent representations. These deep learning algorithms are effective tools for unstructured prediction, and they can be combined in AI systems to solve complex automated reasoning problems. This paper provides a recipe for combining ML algorithms to solve for causal effects in the presence of instrumental variables -- sources of treatment randomization that are conditionally independent from the response. We show that a flexible IV specification resolves into two prediction tasks that can be solved with deep neural nets: a first-stage network for treatment prediction and a second-stage network whose loss function involves integration over the conditional treatment distribution. This Deep IV framework imposes some specific structure on the stochastic gradient descent routine used for training, but it is general enough that we can take advantage of off-the-shelf ML capabilities and avoid extensive algorithm customization. We outline how to obtain out-of-sample causal validation in order to avoid over-fit. We also introduce schemes for both Bayesian and frequentist inference: the former via a novel adaptation of dropout training, and the latter via a data splitting routine.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” stat.AP

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Forecasting: theory and practice

Fotios Petropoulos, Daniele Apiletti, ... (+78 more)

stat.AP πŸ› International Journal of Forecasting πŸ“š 481 cites 5 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted