Maximum Matching in Two, Three, and a Few More Passes Over Graph Streams
February 08, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sagar Kale, Sumedh Tirodkar
arXiv ID
1702.02559
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
29
Venue
International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We consider the maximum matching problem in the semi-streaming model formalized by Feigenbaum, Kannan, McGregor, Suri, and Zhang that is inspired by giant graphs of today. As our main result, we give a two-pass $(1/2 + 1/16)$-approximation algorithm for triangle-free graphs and a two-pass $(1/2 + 1/32)$-approximation algorithm for general graphs; these improve the approximation ratios of $1/2 + 1/52$ for bipartite graphs and $1/2 + 1/140$ for general graphs by Konrad, Magniez, and Mathieu. In three passes, we achieve approximation ratios of $1/2 + 1/10$ for triangle-free graphs and $1/2 + 1/19.753$ for general graphs. We also give a multi-pass algorithm where we bound the number of passes precisely---we give a $(2/3 -\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that uses $2/(3\varepsilon)$ passes for triangle-free graphs and $4/(3\varepsilon)$ passes for general graphs. Our algorithms are simple and combinatorial, use $O(n \log n)$ space, and have $O(1)$ update time per edge. For general graphs, our multi-pass algorithm improves the best known deterministic algorithms in terms of the number of passes: --Ahn and Guha give a $(2/3 - \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that uses $O(\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ passes, whereas our $(2/3 - \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm uses $4/(3\varepsilon)$ passes; --they also give a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that uses $O(\log n \cdot \mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon))$ passes, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the input graph; although our algorithm is $(2/3 - \varepsilon)$-approximation, our number of passes do not depend on $n$. Earlier multi-pass algorithms either have a large constant inside big-$O$ notation for the number of passes or the constant cannot be determined due to the involved analysis, so our multi-pass algorithm should use much fewer passes for approximation ratios bounded slightly below $2/3$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted