Optimal Unateness Testers for Real-Valued Functions: Adaptivity Helps

March 15, 2017 · Declared Dead · 🏛 International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Roksana Baleshzar, Deeparnab Chakrabarty, Ramesh Krishnan S. Pallavoor, Sofya Raskhodnikova, C. Seshadhri arXiv ID 1703.05199 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM Citations 16 Venue International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of testing unateness of functions $f:\{0,1\}^d \to \mathbb{R}.$ We give a $O(\frac{d}ε \cdot \log\frac{d}ε)$-query nonadaptive tester and a $O(\frac{d}ε)$-query adaptive tester and show that both testers are optimal for a fixed distance parameter $ε$. Previously known unateness testers worked only for Boolean functions, and their query complexity had worse dependence on the dimension both for the adaptive and the nonadaptive case. Moreover, no lower bounds for testing unateness were known. We also generalize our results to obtain optimal unateness testers for functions $f:[n]^d \to \mathbb{R}$. Our results establish that adaptivity helps with testing unateness of real-valued functions on domains of the form $\{0,1\}^d$ and, more generally, $[n]^d$. This stands in contrast to the situation for monotonicity testing where there is no adaptivity gap for functions $f:[n]^d \to \mathbb{R}$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted