Comparison of Different Methods for Tissue Segmentation in Histopathological Whole-Slide Images

March 17, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors PΓ©ter BΓ‘ndi, Rob van de Loo, Milad Intezar, Daan Geijs, Francesco Ciompi, Bram van Ginneken, Jeroen van der Laak, Geert Litjens arXiv ID 1703.05990 Category cs.CV: Computer Vision Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 46 Venue IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging Last Checked 6 months ago
Abstract
Tissue segmentation is an important pre-requisite for efficient and accurate diagnostics in digital pathology. However, it is well known that whole-slide scanners can fail in detecting all tissue regions, for example due to the tissue type, or due to weak staining because their tissue detection algorithms are not robust enough. In this paper, we introduce two different convolutional neural network architectures for whole slide image segmentation to accurately identify the tissue sections. We also compare the algorithms to a published traditional method. We collected 54 whole slide images with differing stains and tissue types from three laboratories to validate our algorithms. We show that while the two methods do not differ significantly they outperform their traditional counterpart (Jaccard index of 0.937 and 0.929 vs. 0.870, p < 0.01).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computer Vision

πŸŒ… πŸŒ… Old Age

Fast R-CNN

Ross Girshick

cs.CV πŸ› ICCV πŸ“š 27.7K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted