A Comparison of deep learning methods for environmental sound
March 20, 2017 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Juncheng Li, Wei Dai, Florian Metze, Shuhui Qu, Samarjit Das
arXiv ID
1703.06902
Category
cs.SD: Sound
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
135
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Environmental sound detection is a challenging application of machine learning because of the noisy nature of the signal, and the small amount of (labeled) data that is typically available. This work thus presents a comparison of several state-of-the-art Deep Learning models on the IEEE challenge on Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) 2016 challenge task and data, classifying sounds into one of fifteen common indoor and outdoor acoustic scenes, such as bus, cafe, car, city center, forest path, library, train, etc. In total, 13 hours of stereo audio recordings are available, making this one of the largest datasets available. We perform experiments on six sets of features, including standard Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC), Binaural MFCC, log Mel-spectrum and two different large- scale temporal pooling features extracted using OpenSMILE. On these features, we apply five models: Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Convolutional Deep Neural Net- work (CNN) and i-vector. Using the late-fusion approach, we improve the performance of the baseline 72.5% by 15.6% in 4-fold Cross Validation (CV) avg. accuracy and 11% in test accuracy, which matches the best result of the DCASE 2016 challenge. With large feature sets, deep neural network models out- perform traditional methods and achieve the best performance among all the studied methods. Consistent with other work, the best performing single model is the non-temporal DNN model, which we take as evidence that sounds in the DCASE challenge do not exhibit strong temporal dynamics.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Sound
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
CNN Architectures for Large-Scale Audio Classification
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Conv-TasNet: Surpassing Ideal Time-Frequency Magnitude Masking for Speech Separation
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Data Augmentation for Environmental Sound Classification
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
WaveGlow: A Flow-based Generative Network for Speech Synthesis
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Multi-talker Speech Separation with Utterance-level Permutation Invariant Training of Deep Recurrent Neural Networks
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted