Deep Learning Based Regression and Multi-class Models for Acute Oral Toxicity Prediction with Automatic Chemical Feature Extraction

April 16, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Youjun Xu, Jianfeng Pei, Luhua Lai arXiv ID 1704.04718 Category stat.ML: Machine Learning (Stat) Cross-listed cs.LG, q-bio.QM Citations 199 Venue Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
For quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) studies in chemoinformatics, it is important to get interpretable relationship between chemical properties and chemical features. However, the predictive power and interpretability of QSPR models are usually two different objectives that are difficult to achieve simultaneously. A deep learning architecture using molecular graph encoding convolutional neural networks (MGE-CNN) provided a universal strategy to construct interpretable QSPR models with high predictive power. Instead of using application-specific preset molecular descriptors or fingerprints, the models can be resolved using raw and pertinent features without manual intervention or selection. In this study, we developed acute oral toxicity (AOT) models of compounds using the MGE-CNN architecture as a case study. Three types of high-level predictive models: regression model (deepAOT-R), multi-classification model (deepAOT-C) and multi-task model (deepAOT-CR) for AOT evaluation were constructed. These models highly outperformed previously reported models. For the two external datasets containing 1673 (test set I) and 375 (test set II) compounds, the R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) of deepAOT-R on the test set I were 0.864 and 0.195, and the prediction accuracy of deepAOT-C was 95.5% and 96.3% on the test set I and II, respectively. The two external prediction accuracy of deepAOT-CR is 95.0% and 94.1%, while the R2 and MAE are 0.861 and 0.204 for test set I, respectively.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Machine Learning (Stat)

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Graph Attention Networks

Petar VeličkoviΔ‡, Guillem Cucurull, ... (+4 more)

stat.ML πŸ› ICLR πŸ“š 24.7K cites 8 years ago
R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Layer Normalization

Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, Geoffrey E. Hinton

stat.ML πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 12.0K cites 9 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted