A Century of Science: Globalization of Scientific Collaborations, Citations, and Innovations
April 17, 2017 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yuxiao Dong, Hao Ma, Zhihong Shen, Kuansan Wang
arXiv ID
1704.05150
Category
cs.DL: Digital Libraries
Cross-listed
cs.SI,
physics.soc-ph
Citations
113
Venue
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
Progress in science has advanced the development of human society across history, with dramatic revolutions shaped by information theory, genetic cloning, and artificial intelligence, among the many scientific achievements produced in the 20th century. However, the way that science advances itself is much less well-understood. In this work, we study the evolution of scientific development over the past century by presenting an anatomy of 89 million digitalized papers published between 1900 and 2015. We find that science has benefited from the shift from individual work to collaborative effort, with over 90% of the world-leading innovations generated by collaborations in this century, nearly four times higher than they were in the 1900s. We discover that rather than the frequent myopic- and self-referencing that was common in the early 20th century, modern scientists instead tend to look for literature further back and farther around. Finally, we also observe the globalization of scientific development from 1900 to 2015, including 25-fold and 7-fold increases in international collaborations and citations, respectively, as well as a dramatic decline in the dominant accumulation of citations by the US, the UK, and Germany, from ~95% to ~50% over the same period. Our discoveries are meant to serve as a starter for exploring the visionary ways in which science has developed throughout the past century, generating insight into and an impact upon the current scientific innovations and funding policies.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Digital Libraries
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
On the Performance of Hybrid Search Strategies for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
A Systematic Identification and Analysis of Scientists on Twitter
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted