An Improved Bound for Minimizing the Total Weighted Completion Time of Coflows in Datacenters

April 26, 2017 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mehrnoosh Shafiee, Javad Ghaderi arXiv ID 1704.08357 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DM Citations 63 Venue IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
In data-parallel computing frameworks, intermediate parallel data is often produced at various stages which needs to be transferred among servers in the datacenter network (e.g. the shuffle phase in MapReduce). A stage often cannot start or be completed unless all the required data pieces from the preceding stage are received. \emph{Coflow} is a recently proposed networking abstraction to capture such communication patterns. We consider the problem of efficiently scheduling coflows with release dates in a shared datacenter network so as to minimize the total weighted completion time of coflows. Several heuristics have been proposed recently to address this problem, as well as a few polynomial-time approximation algorithms with provable performance guarantees. Our main result in this paper is a polynomial-time deterministic algorithm that improves the prior known results. Specifically, we propose a deterministic algorithm with approximation ratio of $5$, which improves the prior best known ratio of $12$. For the special case when all coflows are released at time zero, our deterministic algorithm obtains approximation ratio of $4$ which improves the prior best known ratio of $8$. The key ingredient of our approach is an improved linear program formulation for sorting the coflows followed by a simple list scheduling policy. Extensive simulation results, using both synthetic and real traffic traces, are presented that verify the performance of our algorithm and show improvement over the prior approaches.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted