Determinant-Preserving Sparsification of SDDM Matrices with Applications to Counting and Sampling Spanning Trees

May 02, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors David Durfee, John Peebles, Richard Peng, Anup B. Rao arXiv ID 1705.00985 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 33 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We show variants of spectral sparsification routines can preserve the total spanning tree counts of graphs, which by Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem, is equivalent to determinant of a graph Laplacian minor, or equivalently, of any SDDM matrix. Our analyses utilizes this combinatorial connection to bridge between statistical leverage scores / effective resistances and the analysis of random graphs by [Janson, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing `94]. This leads to a routine that in quadratic time, sparsifies a graph down to about $n^{1.5}$ edges in ways that preserve both the determinant and the distribution of spanning trees (provided the sparsified graph is viewed as a random object). Extending this algorithm to work with Schur complements and approximate Choleksy factorizations leads to algorithms for counting and sampling spanning trees which are nearly optimal for dense graphs. We give an algorithm that computes a $(1 \pm Ξ΄)$ approximation to the determinant of any SDDM matrix with constant probability in about $n^2 Ξ΄^{-2}$ time. This is the first routine for graphs that outperforms general-purpose routines for computing determinants of arbitrary matrices. We also give an algorithm that generates in about $n^2 Ξ΄^{-2}$ time a spanning tree of a weighted undirected graph from a distribution with total variation distance of $Ξ΄$ from the $w$-uniform distribution .
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted